SUMMARY
Advantages:
Large part availability
Low tooling cost
High strength to weight ratio
Very good durability and impact strength
Disadvantages
Thicker walls vs. injection molding
Slow cycle times (lower production yield vs. injection molding)
Finished part has “swirl” marks on exterior requiring secondary finishing if the exterior
appearance is important
TYPICAL APPLICATIONS
Material handling applications
Toys
Automotive parts
Boating products
Sporting goods
Furniture
Custom Products
Structural foam molding is typically used in load bearing or large part
applications in which a high degree of rigidity and lower weight is desired
vs. injection molding. Structural foam is not to be confused with expanded
polystyrene, which is associated with disposable foam blocks that package
and protect new appliances and electronics. Instead, structural foam is an
extension of the injection molding process with the exception that it has
the advantage of producing very large parts with thick walls, up to 3/8”
thick. The finished product exhibits a superior strength to weight ratio
and a very durable part, useful in industrial applications.
The tooling used for structural foam molding is also lower in cost than
injection molding, lending the process to custom product applications.
Injection molding requires very high internal pressure within the mold
necessitating the usage of high strength steel to withstand the stress when
the material is injected into the cavity. Structural foam molding differs in
that a chemical blowing agent is injected with the material and expands the
material within the cavity of the mold, greatly reducing the internal pressure
inside the mold. The finished part has a solid skin on the exterior and a
cellular cross-section internally due to the foaming action of the blowing
agent. As a result of the low molding pressure, structural foam tooling is
typically made of aluminum, which can be machined up to three times faster
than steel molds and weighs approximately one third less than equivalent steel
molds. The shortcoming of structural foam is that the wall thickness must be
fairly thick, usually no less than 1/4”, as the thick walls act as channels
for the material to flow under low pressure and for the chemical blowing agent
to provide the cellular coring of the part.. Additionally, structural foam
molding has a drawback with production yield (parts per hour) vs. injection
molding as the thick walls require longer cooling times before the part can
be removed from the mold.
|